Rutovitsky v. Magliocco
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Bok,
The plaintiff, appellee, has a verdict for personal injuries. The questions raised by motions for a new trial and for judgment n.o.v. are the plaintiff’s contributory negligence and the lack of defendant’s negligence.
The facts, established by the verdict most favorably to the plaintiff, are these:
He was returning home on foot from a personal errand. He is a small man and was seventy-two years old at the time of the accident. He reached the crosswalk at the northwest corner of two Philadelphia streets, Ninth and Shunk, and was facing east in' order to cross Ninth on…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Auel v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Ebersole v. BeistlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Finnin v. NeubertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Fries v. RitterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Goodall v. HessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Morris v. MossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Solomon v. BaumCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Groner v. HedrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Caine v. CollinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Ridgway National Bank, Guardian of the Estate of Robert Aiello, a Mental Incompetent v. North American Van Lines, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.