Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Charles A. Perkins v. Robert Lecureux

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 21, 1995No. 94-1594Published

1ConcurrenceNathaniel R. Jones, Circuit Judge

While I concur in the conclusion reached by the majority, I write separately to explain that there is another important principle at stake in this case — the constitutional right to equal protection of the laws. The majority opinion emphasizes that it is an historical rule that a judge may not impeach his or her judicial determinations. Nevertheless, this rule of judicial finality must not be construed as always precluding relief from a claim brought under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

In the instant case, Judge Del Rio’s statement, when considered in its full…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dobbs v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. Robert W. Crouch and Albert Kudelka, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. James B. Shillcutt v. John R. GagnonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  4. Wilburn Dobbs v. Walter D. Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  5. Dobbs v. ZantDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API