Charles A. Perkins v. Robert Lecureux
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1ConcurrenceNathaniel R. Jones, Circuit Judge
While I concur in the conclusion reached by the majority, I write separately to explain that there is another important principle at stake in this case — the constitutional right to equal protection of the laws. The majority opinion emphasizes that it is an historical rule that a judge may not impeach his or her judicial determinations. Nevertheless, this rule of judicial finality must not be construed as always precluding relief from a claim brought under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
In the instant case, Judge Del Rio’s statement, when considered in its full…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dobbs v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Robert W. Crouch and Albert Kudelka, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- James B. Shillcutt v. John R. GagnonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Wilburn Dobbs v. Walter D. Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Dobbs v. ZantDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1989