Legal Opinion

Hammond v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 24, 1953No. 34748PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

This case turns on the question of whether or not the State proved the venue. While, in the absence of evidence sufficient to raise an inference to the contrary, slight proof that the venue of the crime is properly laid is sufficient, nevertheless, venue is a fact essential to the jurisdiction of the court and must be proved by evidence and beyond a reasonable doubt. Dempsey v. State, 52 Ga. App. 35 (2) (182 S. E. 56); Green v. State, 4 Ga. App. 260 (1) (61 S. E. 234). The State depends here for proof of the venue on the answer of a State’s witness to the following question: “In this State…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Moye v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  2. Murphy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  4. Dempsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  5. Hicks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Patterson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  2. Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API