Legal Opinion

Loza v. Panish

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 27, 1980No. Civ. 56355PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROTH, P. J.

Appellant sought a writ of mandate pursuant to Elections Code section 100151 to compel respondent to reject any candidate’s statement submitted under Elections Code section 10012 that contains any reference to anything other than the candidate’s own *823“education and qualifications” and particularly any candidate’s statement that contains any reference to any opposing candidate. The petition was denied and this appeal ensued. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Elections Code section 10012 provides in pertinent part that: “Each candidate for nonpartisan elective office in any…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Beauharnais v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Wilson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Dailey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Canaan v. AbdelnourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Bachrach v. Secretary of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Hammond v. AgranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Bachrach v. Secretary of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  5. Canaan v. AbdelnourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API