Legal Opinion

Robert D. Gradsky v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 17, 1954No. 12187PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The above case came on for hearing on the record, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments by counsel for the Commissioner and by petitioner, acting as his own counsel. It appears that a statutory notice of deficiency was mailed to petitioner taxpayer at his correct address by registered mail; that taxpayer’s petition for redetermination of deficiency was not filed within ninety days after the mailing of the notice of deficiency, as provided in Section 272(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. § 272.

On the ninetieth day after the mailing of notice of the deficiency, petitioner…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kahler-Ellis Company, Etc. v. The Ohio Turnpike Commission and the Ohio National BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
  2. Wilfred C. Rice and Martha J. Rice v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  3. Gus Lindsey, Jr. v. E. P. Perini, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  4. Naysha Oquendo v. Comm'r of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
  5. Sylvan v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API