Carolyn A. Lamb v. United States Postal Service, Harold A. Latiolais, Postmaster, and Acting Postmaster
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Carolyn A. Lamb instituted this employment discrimination action to rectify what she claims was a racially-motivated decision to deny her a job promotion. Her employer, the United States Postal Service (“the Service”), and Harold A. Latiolais, the postmaster who refused to promote her, contend that they are improper defendants to this action.
As the defendants correctly note, Lamb, who is a federal employee, must rely upon 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16(a)-(c), which provides the exclusive remedy for the employment discrimination claims of federal employees. Section 2000e-16(c) required Lamb to file her…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Schiavone v. FortuneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Newbold v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Jesse Ray Bell v. Veterans Administration HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Joe T. Gonzales v. Secretary of the Air Force and the Department of the Air Force, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Rene Ynclan Ynclan v. Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Minnie M. Honeycutt v. John E. Long, Major General Commander, Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Robert Warren v. Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Jose A. Soto v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Eulas Montgomery v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.