Legal Opinion

Finn v. Renyx, Field & Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1960Published

1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittoni, J.

This is a motion by certain defendants for an order (Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 180, 193) dismissing the complaint for unreasonable neglect to serve indispensable parties, or in the alternative (Civ. Prac. Act, § 193; Rules Civ. Prac., rule 102) to require plaintiffs to bring in indispensable parties and to stay the proceedings until that shall have been done and extending defendants’ time to answer.

The action has been described by this court (Meyer, J.), in denying a motion to compel separate statement and numbering of causes of action, as one the gravamen of which is alleged fraud of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fox v. Western New York Motor Lines, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Keene v. ChambersNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Morgenstern v. FreudenbergNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Sharkany v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API