Roskind v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEVENS, J.
Does federal law preempt a state law cause of action brought under California’s unfair competition law (UCL), Business and Professions Code section 17200 et seq.,1 where a brokerage firm is alleged to have violated its duty to its customers, by not executing their orders for stock sales in a fair and timely manner, and by instead “trading ahead” for its own benefit before processing those sales for its customers? We conclude there is no provision of federal law that preempts a state law cause of action under the UCL in these circumstances, and therefore we must reverse the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. EpsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Roskind v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000