Legal Opinion

Lehner v. Loomis

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 14, 1891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Polk District Court. — Hon. Marcus Kavanaug-h, Jr., Judge. This is an action in equity for a decree setting aside a sheriff’s sale and deed of certain real estate. There was a hearing on the merits, and a decree for the plaintiff. The defendants appeal,

1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, J.

I. The property in controversy in the action is part of a lot, with a building thereon, situated on Walnut street, in the city of Des Moines. It appears in evidence that on the twenty-second day of March, 1886, the title to said real estate was in Joseph Lehner, the husband of the plaintiff, and that on that day an action in equity was commenced against certain occupants of the said building, charging them with keeping a saloon nuisance therein, and asking that the said nuisance be enjoined and abated. Joseph Lehner was made a party defendant. The record does not show what relief was asked…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Peterson v. LittleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  2. Sigerson v. SigersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  3. Wallace v. BergerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wyman v. BowmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  2. Copper v. Iowa Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  3. Sheppard v. MessengerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  4. Fortin v. SedgwickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  5. Cornoy v. WetmoreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API