Legal Opinion

Bobby v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 9, 2000No. 99-816PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ray Thornton, Justice.

Appellants, Bobby and Angie Ullom, appeal from the judgment of the Benton County Chancery Court terminating their parental rights to their three-year-old child, D.U. For reversal, appellants argue that the chancellor’s findings were not supported by clear and convincing evidence. In a three-to-three decision, the court of appeals affirmed the chancellor.1 We accepted review of this case and affirm the trial court.

Facts and Procedural History

Appellants are the parents of D.U. born August 1, 1996. On August 21, 1996, D.U. was taken to St. Mary’s Hospital. While at the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. J.T. v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Wade v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Baker v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Burke v. StrangeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Ullom v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Camarillo-Cox v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  2. Bearden v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Jefferson v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  4. Hudson v. KyleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  5. Trout v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API