Tallman v. Baltimore & O. R.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio
At Law. On motion to quash service of summons.
1Opinion of the CourtSage, J.
These cases were removed from the court of common pleas of Belmont county, Ohio, by the defendant. The service in each case, as shown by the transcript, was by delivering to O. W. Stralls, “ticket agent and general agent of the within named, the B. & O. R. R. Co., a certified copy of this summons, with all the indorsements thereon, the president or other chief officer of the said B. & O. R. R. Co., not found in my county.” The-defendant now comes, and, “entering its appearance for the purpose of this motion, and for no other purpose whatsoever,” moves the court to quash the summons and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bushnell v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Knowles v. The Gaslight and Coke CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Sayles v. Northwestern Ins. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1854
- Sweeney v. CoffinU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1870
3Cited by8 opinions
- Southern Building & Loan Ass'n v. HallumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
- Wabash Western Ry. v. BrowCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
- Karns v. State Bank & Trust Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1909
- Hawkins v. PeirceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1897
- Adams v. HeckscherU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.