Legal Opinion

Frankfort Oil Company v. Abrams

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 11, 1966No. 21071Published

1Opinion of the Court

413 P.2d 190 (1966)

FRANKFORT OIL COMPANY, a division of Joseph E. Seagram & Son, Inc., Plaintiff in Error,

v.

Harry R. ABRAMS, also known as H. R. Abrams, Defendant in Error.

No. 21071.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

April 11, 1966.

Gorsuch, Kirgis, Campbell, Walker & Grover, Roscoe Walker, Jr., Charles M. Stoddard, Denver, Eldon E. Scott, Dallas, Tex., Gordon, Gordon & Johnson, Lamar, of counsel, for plaintiff in error.

Oakley Wade, Las Animas, Thulemeyer & Stewart, La Junta, for defendant in error.

SUTTON, Chief Justice.

This writ of error concerns the question as to whether damages awarded a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tucker v. ParksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
  2. City of Pueblo v. GriffinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  3. Hoover v. ShottSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  4. Frankfort Oil Company v. AbramsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  5. O'CONNOR v. Great Lakes Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API