Bruce v. Leo

The two cases included in the title are identical and have been consolidated for disposition; however, defendant in error Holesworth, not desiring to contest or participate further, his name has been omitted from the discussions of counsel for defendant.

The case as presented involves construction of the liquor code of 1935, and, as amended is now to be found as S.L. ’41, p. 517, §1—20 (a). Under this code plaintiff in error, Secretary of State, is charged with the administrative duties connected with, and the enforcement of, the code, and is designated as - state licensing authority with…