Olivera Hardy Crisp, and Preston Alligood v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellants were convicted of three separate sales of narcotics in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 4705(a). Upon appeal they claim that the trial court erred in refusing to submit a defense of entrapment to the jury, the court holding there was no evidence to support such defense.
The evidence discloses that a Government agent, Montague, went to Washington, North Carolina, to conduct an investigation of suspected narcotics violations. Montague contacted one Roy Roosevelt Warren (a co-defendant here who pleaded guilty and has not appealed), whose name was previously known to Montague as being suspected…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Purification Rodriguez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Ryles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Gulfstream Park Racing Ass'n v. Hialeah Race Course, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Ryles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
3Cited by30 opinions
- William Clayton Pierce v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- State v. MullenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- United States v. Frederick MathewsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Walter RileyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Earl Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.