Legal Opinion

Ceron v. Paxton National Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 24, 1989No. 88-1348PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Generally exclusionary clauses in an insurance policy are construed strictly against the issuer of the policy. National Automobile Insurance Association v. Brumit, 98 So.2d 830 (Fla.1957); United States Sugar Corporation v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, 475 So.2d 1350 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Tropical Park, Inc. v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, 357 So.2d 253 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corporation, Ltd. v. Kellin, 391 So.2d 305 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); George v. Stone, 260 So.2d 258 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972). The exclusionary clause involved in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tropical Park, Inc. v. US Fidelity & Guar.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  2. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. PhelpsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  3. Brantley v. City of Baton RougeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Collins v. Royal Globe Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  5. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. VordermeierDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Petersen v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API