United States v. 88.88 Acres of Land, More or Less State of California Edward Ordway, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
NOONAN, Circuit Judge:
The United States appeals a jury award of $1,404,190 in a condemnation proceeding and a portion of a fee award under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (Supp.1989) (EAJA). We find no merit in the government’s challenges to the discretionary rulings on evidence of the district court and so affirm the money judgment for the condemnation. We publish this opinion only to address aspects of the EAJA award.
The statute makes an individual ineligible for attorney fees if his net worth exceeds $2 million at the time the civil action was filed. 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- American Pacific Concrete Pipe Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
3Cited by18 opinions
- Swanson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1996
- Sosebee v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Henry Ruffin Broaddus, and Frances Broaddus Crutchfield v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, and County of Hanover, VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Shooting Star Ranch, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Sanders v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.