State v. Hampton
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtDwyer, J.
¶1 “[T]he Sixth Amendment guarantees a defendant the right to be represented by an otherwise qualified attorney whom that defendant can afford to hire, or who is willing to represent the defendant even though he is without funds.” Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United States, 491 U.S. 617, 624-25, 109 S. Ct. 2646, 105 L. Ed. 2d 528 (1989); U.S. Const. amend. VI. This right provides a particular guaranty: that “the accused be defended by the counsel he believes to be best.” United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez, 548 U.S. 140, 146, 126 S. Ct. 2557, 165 L. Ed. 2d 409 (2006). In this case, Matthew…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. HamptonWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- Department of Social & Health Services v. SalazarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State Of Washington v. Adrian Sassen VanelslooCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State Of Washington v. Kevin Lee GarrisonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State Of Washington v. Vinay Keshavan BharadwajCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.