Bolling v. State

Peterson, Justice.

Following a jury trial, Eric Lamont Bolling was convicted of the murder of Parviz Moledina, as well as burglary in the first degree and possession of a knife during the commission of a felony.1 Bolling appeals and argues that (1) the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions, (2) the trial court erred in allowing the State to introduce into evidence prior trial testimony of a co-defendant, and *695(3) the trial court erred in allowing the State to play the co-defendant’s videotaped police interview to the jury. We affirm because the evidence was sufficient to sustain…