Legal Opinion

Smith v. WISCONSIN PHYSICIANS SERVICE

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 10, 1989No. 88-2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDykman, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from an order granting Wisconsin Physician's Service's (WPS) motion for summary judgment. Because the trial court correctly concluded that no material issue of fact existed and that WPS was entitled to summary judgment, we affirm.

Plaintiffs, Thomas S. Smith, Teresa Smith and Thomas Smith, Jr., commenced this action against WPS to recover health insurance benefits allegedly due under the State of Wisconsin Standard Health Insurance Plan. Plaintiffs' complaint alleged that WPS acted in bad faith in its administration of claims for health care services, and demanded contract…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ibrahim v. SamoreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Voell v. KleinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Peabody Seating Co. v. Jim Cullen, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Western Industries, Inc. v. Vilter Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Novak v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  2. Towne Realty, Inc. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
  3. Contardi v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API