Barbara W. Wolff and Janice Wheeler Tinker v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The United States having filed a petition for rehearing with a suggestion for rehearing en banc, and the petition having been circulated not only to the original panel members but also to all other active judges of the court, and no judge having requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc, the petition for rehearing has been referred to the original hearing panel.
The panel notes that the original decision, 967 F.2d 222, is claimed to have been erroneous insofar as it held that absent evidence of a contrary intent by the grantor, federal law looks to state riparian rights law…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pollard's Lessee v. HAGANSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Railroad Co. v. SchurmeirSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Oregon Ex Rel. State Land Board v. Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Packer v. BirdSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Koch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Koch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Koch v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1993