Legal Opinion

Barbara W. Wolff and Janice Wheeler Tinker v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 28, 1992No. 91-2252PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The United States having filed a petition for rehearing with a suggestion for rehearing en banc, and the petition having been circulated not only to the original panel members but also to all other active judges of the court, and no judge having requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc, the petition for rehearing has been referred to the original hearing panel.

The panel notes that the original decision, 967 F.2d 222, is claimed to have been erroneous insofar as it held that absent evidence of a contrary intent by the grantor, federal law looks to state riparian rights law…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pollard's Lessee v. HAGANSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  2. Railroad Co. v. SchurmeirSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Oregon Ex Rel. State Land Board v. Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Packer v. BirdSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Koch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. Koch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  3. Koch v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API