Legal Opinion

Krohn v. Steinlauf

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 6, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*696In an action to recover death, benefits allegedly dne and payable pursuant to the terms of two group life insurance policies, plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated November 9, 1959, as: (1) denies their motion, pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for summary judgment against the two defendant insurance companies; and (2) grants said defendants’ cross motions, pursuant to the same rule, to dismiss the complaint. Order insofar as appealed from modified: (a) by striking out its second ordering paragraph granting the cross motions…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ziegler v. Mancuso & Alessio, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  2. Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance v. London Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Contelmo's Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. J & J Milano, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Herbert F. Darling, Inc. v. City of Niagara FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API