Legal Opinion

J.T. Mauro Co. v. Genesee Valley Group Health Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 5, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from order insofar as it denied reargument unanimously dismissed without costs and *999otherwise order affirmed. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendants’ cross motion to consolidate. A motion to consolidate is directed to the sound discretion of the court, and the court is afforded wide latitude in the exercise thereof (see, Pirodsky v Pirodsky, 179 AD2d 1066; Inspiration Enters. v Inland Credit Corp., 54 AD2d 839, 840, appeal dismissed 40 NY2d 1014). Although the two actions sought to be consolidated here stem from the same construction project,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Inspiration Enterprises, Inc. v. Inland Credit Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. Brown v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Pennino v. Lasersurge Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Pirodsky v. PirodskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. H. H. Robertson Co. v. New York Convention Center Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. M & K Computer Corp. v. MBS Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Scott v. Town of SkaneatelesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API