Jahns & Knuth Co. v. American Indemnity Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed December 11, 1923:
Eschweiler, J.
The question of' primary importance presented is as to whether or not the American Indemnity Company, appellant, can successfully defend because of the* clause purporting to eliminate liability for accident caused by elevator or hoist as found in the indorsement attached to the policy and above quoted.
The firamework or structure erected in front of the building, being of the usual form and construction in general use for that kind of work and from which the hopper fell causing the accident, was certainly an elevator or hoist…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- St. Louis Dressed Beef & Provision Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Littlejohn v. . ShawNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Fullerton v. United States Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1918
- Ward v. Queen City Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Murphy & Co. v. Manufacturers' Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Wausau Chemical Corp.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1992
- Continental Casualty Co. v. ShankelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
- D'ANGELO v. Cornell Paperboard Products Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Deban v. Continental Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.