Legal Opinion

New York Cent. & H. R. R. v. Interstate Commerce Commission

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided February 8, 1909PublishedCited by 16 opinions

In Equity. On motion for preliminary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

NOYES, Circuit Judge.

This is an application for an injunction restraining pendente lite the Interstate Commerce Commission from enforcing its order dated June 21, 1908, in a proceeding instituted by the Hecker-Jones-Jewell Milling Company against the present complainants as defendants therein. In its complaint in such proceeding the milling company alleged, in substance, that it was engaged in manufacturing wheat into flour at the city of New York both for domestic use and for export; that it was obliged to obtain its supply of wheat in various Western states, and to ship the same to its…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Alamo Express, Inc. v. Union City TransferTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Mansfield Journal Co. (Fm) v. Federal Communications Commission Mansfield Journal Co. (Fm) v. Federal Communications Commission (Harry, Intervenor). Lorain Journal Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Piqua Munising Wood Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
  4. Dart Transit Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1953
  5. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. Railroad CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1911

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API