May v. DuPont
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
HERRMANN, Justice.
The question on this appeal is whether less than all of the co-executors in the instant case may distribute the residuary estate under 12 Del.C. § 2312(b). 1
The will named three executors, two being the plaintiffs in this cause and the third being the defendant. After providing for the payment of debts, administration' expenses, charitable gifts and taxes, the will provided that the residue of the estate be conveyed to the plaintiffs and the defendant as co-trustees under eight separate equal trusts — one for each of the testator’s surviving children. The will provided that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Estate of Greenberg v. SugarmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
- Sellers v. Joseph Bancroft & Sons Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1941
- Bernhardt v. LukeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1956
- Galt v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925
- In re the Estate of BrownOrphan's Court of Delaware · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re: Estate of Moskowitz, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Jones v. TaylorCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1975
- Madden v. PhelpsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1995
- May v. duPontSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
- David Houghton v. Debbie Ceresini, John Houghton, Jr.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.