Legal Opinion
Whipp v. Seafarers Vacation Plan
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided April 17, 1986No. Civ. No. Y-84-4449PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOSEPH H. YOUNG, District Judge.
Clifford D. Whipp brought this action against Seafarers Vacation Plan, alleging that the Plan’s denial of .his application for vacation benefits was arbitrary and capricious. Whipp claims that the Plan violated the Taft-Hartley Act, 29 U.S.C. § 186, which requires that employee benefit plans be established and administered for the sole benefit of employees. He also claims that the Plan violated 29 U.S.C. §§ 1103, 1104, which require that the assets of an employee welfare and benefit plan be held for the exclusive purpose of providing benefits to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hebra A. Berry v. Ciba-Geigy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- United Mine Workers of America Health & Retirement Funds v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Handee T. Lee v. Robert NesbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- William Johnson v. Joseph BoticaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Clifford D. Whipp v. Seafarers Vacation PlanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987