Legal Opinion

McMahon v. Fowler Bros.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1883PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLawrence, J.

It is too late to attack the amount of the assessment or of the tax imposed, inasmuch as it nowhere appears that the firm of Fowler Brothers availed themselves of the provisions of the statute which relates to an erroneous assessment and the correction thereof (Smyth agt. International Life Assurance Co., 35 How. Pr. R., 126, and cases cited). The resident member of the firm, who makes an affidavit in opposition to this proceeding, admits that it is carrying on business here, but alleges that that business is tributary to the business in Liverpool, and that there are no moneys in this city…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hoyt v. . the Commissioners of TaxesNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  2. The Parker Mills v. . the Commissioners of TaxesNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  3. International Life Assurance Society v. CommissionersNew York Supreme Court · 1858
  4. British Commercial Fire Insurance v. Commissioners of Taxes & AssessmentsNew York Court of Appeals · 1864

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bluefields Banana Co. v. Board of AssessorsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1897
  2. State v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API