Prater v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion
ON PETITION TO REHEAR
TODD, J.
A petition to rehear has been filed on behalf of defendant, Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company, on the ground that the opinion filed in this cause oil July 26, *911968 did not discuss or dispose of a “Motion to Strike the Bill of Exceptions”, a “Suggestion of Diminution”, and a “Demurrer and Motion to Strike the Suggestion of Diminution”.
The “Motion to Strike the Bill of Exceptions” was as follows:
“In this cause comes the defendant-in-error or ap-pellee, Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, Inc. and moves the Court to strike the Bill of Exceptions filed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Powell v. Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1890
- Norton v. Standard Coosa-Thatcher CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1958
- Railway Companies v. HendricksTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
- Fernow v. Dubuque & Southwestern RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
- Jackson v. StonerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.