Legal Opinion

Prater v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided July 26, 1968Published

1Opinion

ON PETITION TO REHEAR

TODD, J.

A petition to rehear has been filed on behalf of defendant, Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company, on the ground that the opinion filed in this cause oil July 26, *911968 did not discuss or dispose of a “Motion to Strike the Bill of Exceptions”, a “Suggestion of Diminution”, and a “Demurrer and Motion to Strike the Suggestion of Diminution”.

The “Motion to Strike the Bill of Exceptions” was as follows:

“In this cause comes the defendant-in-error or ap-pellee, Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, Inc. and moves the Court to strike the Bill of Exceptions filed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Powell v. Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Norton v. Standard Coosa-Thatcher CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Railway Companies v. HendricksTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Fernow v. Dubuque & Southwestern RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  5. Jackson v. StonerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API