Legal Opinion

Dobson's Petting Zoo v. Goens

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 18, 1992No. 1910741PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, Justice.

The defendants, Dobson’s Petting Zoo and Nancy Dobson, appeal from a default judgment entered in favor of Richard C. Goens.

On the date the case was set for trial, defendant Nancy Dobson telephoned and notified the court that she was out of the state. She requested a continuance, which was denied. The trial judge thereafter entered a default judgment against the defendants in the amount of $6,500,000. Just prior to the entry of the default judgment, an attorney appeared, representing the interests of Dobson, who, until that time had not obtained counsel. The attorney was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hritz v. Woma Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  2. Kirtland v. Fort Morgan Auth. Sewer Serv., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. Cole Madsen v. A. J. Bumb, Receiver and Trustee for the Estate of Chase Capital Corporation, Dba Quail Valley Country Club, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  4. Oliver v. SawyerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  5. Roberts v. WettlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rooney v. Southern Dependacare, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  2. Rooney v. Southern Dependacare, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API