Legal Opinion
De Lotto v. Fennell
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided February 5, 1952PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
56 So.2d 518 (1951)
DE LOTTO
v.
FENNELL et ux.
Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division A.
December 14, 1951.
On Rehearing February 5, 1952.
W. Marion Hendry and Edward I. Cutler, Tampa, for appellant.
J.D. Hobbs, Jr., Tampa, for appellees.
CHAPMAN, Justice.
It appears by the record in this cause that plaintiff-appellant, DeLotto, a building contractor, repaired and remodeled the home of the Fennells, defendants-appellees. The appellant contends that he entered into a verbal agreement with the Fennells to repair and remodel their dwelling on the basis of a cost-price arrangement plus 10% for his fee…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by11 opinions
- Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. ACME, ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Michael Irvine, Sally Peisner, J. Ray Permenter and Richard Stuart v. Cargill Investor Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Broderick v. Overhead Door Co. of Fort Lauderdale, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
- Trinity Builders, Inc. v. SchaffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
- Davis v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.