Legal Opinion

State v. Viard

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 23, 1981No. 21414PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a search and seizure case. A confidential informant made a controlled buy of drugs at the residence of respondents, William Viard, Sr., and Bonnie Cox Viard. The resi dence was searched, pursuant to a warrant, and a quantity of drugs seized. Respondents moved for and were granted a motion to suppress the drugs. We reverse.

The trial judge held the affidavit supporting the search warrant did not contain information about the informant’s reliability and failed to set forth sufficient underlying facts to enable the magistrate to make an independent finding of probable cause. The State…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. State v. BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. 192 Coin-Operated Video Game MacHinesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. BellamySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. State v. DupreeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  4. State v. BowieCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API