Legal Opinion
Goodman Products Corp. v. A. Lustig, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 11, 1943PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTownley, J.
Plaintiff contracted on October 10,1941, to purchase 200 barrels of frozen grapes. The sales memorandum *507was signed by the defendant. This memorandum read in part as follows:
1 ‘ We, as brokers, have
“ Sold to Goodman Products Corp.,
68 Jay Street,
Brooklyn, New York
“For the Account of ”
The order was subject to buyer’s approval of one sample barrel and contained the following additional stipulations:
“ Unless we appear as seller, any goods billed by us is only as a convenience to the seller.
“ This sale is subject to confirmation of the seller.
“ Sold through A. LUSTIG, INC.
By Milton L. Loew
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cobb v. . KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Ell Dee Clothing Co. v. MarshNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Argersinger v. . MacNaughtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Meyer v. . RedmondNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- McClure v. . Central Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Unger v. Travel Arrangements, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Orient Mid-East Lines v. Albert E. Bowen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Capsco Products, Inc. v. SavageauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Broser v. Royal Abstract Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1966