Legal Opinion

Johnston v. Weissinger

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 23, 1932No. 2 Div. 999PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.

The only question argued by counsel for appellant was the failure of the trial court to grant the defendant’s motion for a new trial for the reason that the. verdict of the jury was contrary to the great weight of the evidence.

It was no doubt the duty of the driver of the car on the road which intersected the main highway, over which the defendant’s automobile was going, to obey the stop sign, which he admitted he did not do. Section 1397 of the Code (Michie’s. Annotated 1928), Act 1927, p. 374 § 67. And the driver of the defendant’s car no doubt had the right to assume that the driver of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Magic City Trucking ServiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  2. Allen v. ZickosAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Moore v. CruitSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Allred v. DobbsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  5. Mobile City Lines, Inc. v. HardySupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API