Legal Opinion

Aries Insurance v. Aleman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 25, 1997No. 96-2566PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JORGENSON, Judge.

The Aries Insurance Company, defendant below, appeals from a non-final order granting partial summary judgment on the issue of liability in favor of Onelia Aleman, plaintiff below. We have jurisdiction, Fla.R.App.P. 9.1S0(a)(3)(C)(iv), and affirm.

Aleman paid Aries $1,042.00 for automobile insurance for one year, but then received a “premium invoice” informing her that an additional $216.48 was due. This invoice, known as a “three option letter,” gave Ale-man three choices: pay the additional premium; request cancellation of the policy; or take no action and have the policy…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re McCollamSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. City of Miami Beach v. GalbutSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  3. Savona v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Florida · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Union American Insurance v. RodriguezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Stinson v. United Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API