District of Columbia v. Towers
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
2 emergency. 3 The Mayor explained that “[t]here is reasonable cause to believe that there is an imminent hazard of or actual occurrence of widespread exposure to an infectious agent (COVID-19) that poses a significant risk of substantial future harm to a large number of people in the District of Columbia,” and that “[t]he spread of COVID-19 is an imminent threat to the health, safety, and welfare of District residents that requires emergency protective actions be undertaken by the District Government.”4 The COVID-19 public health emergency is ongoing. As of May 6, 2021 there have been more…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Christopher v. HarburySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. KrasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.