Legal Opinion

District of Columbia v. Towers

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 13, 2021No. 21-CV-34, 21-CV-35, 21-CV-36, 21-CV-37 & 21-CV-38Published

1Opinion of the Court

2 emergency. 3 The Mayor explained that “[t]here is reasonable cause to believe that there is an imminent hazard of or actual occurrence of widespread exposure to an infectious agent (COVID-19) that poses a significant risk of substantial future harm to a large number of people in the District of Columbia,” and that “[t]he spread of COVID-19 is an imminent threat to the health, safety, and welfare of District residents that requires emergency protective actions be undertaken by the District Government.”4 The COVID-19 public health emergency is ongoing. As of May 6, 2021 there have been more…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Christopher v. HarburySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. United States v. KrasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API