Legal Opinion

White v. Schrafft

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 2, 1947No. 3664PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

'Kenison, J.

The main question is whether the evidence establishes an open account or an account stated between the parties. The course of business between the parties thus becomes material. From July to September of 1931 the plaintiff charged and the defendant paid in full for antiques and merchandise $8,890.90. The Court properly declined to reopen this account and it is not now involved in this litigation. The next bill for about $35,000 covering the period of one year from September, 1931, was paid in full except for a balance of $120 which was waived by the plaintiff and therefore may be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Funkhouser v. J. B. Preston Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. California Milling Corp. v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. State v. MoodySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  3. Eimco-Bsp Service Company v. Valley Inland Pacific Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. Smart v. HernandezSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949
  5. Eimco-Bsp Service Company v. Valley Inland Pacific Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API