Reardon v. Melbourne

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of Thomas M. Reardon against L. A. Melbourne for $162.50.

Plaintiffs’ amended complaint attempts to state four causes of action.

In the first cause of action it is alleged that Reardon is a duly licensed real estate broker; that on January 21, 1940, Reardon and Melbourne entered into a contract concerning the sale of real property in San Diego and that Melbourne signed a memorandum in writing agreeing to pay Reardon $162.50 commission if he found a buyer at the price of $3,250; that Reardon procured his co-plaintiff, Joseph C. Ventura, as a buyer, “who…