Legal Opinion

States v. Bettis

District Court, S.D. California

Decided May 29, 1941No. 1217 O’C CivPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. F. T. O’CONNOR, District Judge.

Can the United States recover money paid for the professional services of physicians, hospitalization, ambulance transportation, X-rays and medicines furnished to injured employee under the provisions of United States Employees’ Compensation Act as contained in Title 5, sec. 751 to 833, U.S.C.A., after the injured employee has recovered a judgment in a tort action against the wrongdoer, without the United States having secured an assignment of the claim from the injured employee. This is the sole question in this action. Neither counsel for the United States…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Western Metal Supply Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Union Iron Works v. Industrial Accident CommisionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. County of San Bernardino v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Jacobsen v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Owen v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. United States v. HayesDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1966
  3. United States v. LimbsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API