Department of Revenue ex rel. Thorman v. Holley
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The Department of Revenue (DOR), acting on behalf of Mary A. Thorman (the mother), appeals a final order ruling that *1201Robert G. Holley (the father) is no longer obligated to pay any child-support arrear-ages that he accrued but may not have satisfied. This ruling was based on the doctrines of laches and estoppel, as well as a determination that the father’s right to due process was violated by the numerous delays in arriving at a final arrearage amount. Under the circumstances of this case, none of these grounds justify relieving the father of his obligation to pay his past-due child support…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- West v. WestDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Sun Cruz Casinos, LLC v. City of HollywoodDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Cartee v. CarswellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Schroeder v. Peoplease Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Gergen v. GergenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- William E. Campbell and Flora D. Campbell v. State of Florida Department of TransportationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- CBHIV LLC, and Sugar Dunes Owners Association, Inc. v. Walton County, Florida, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, AndDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
- Cardinal Point, LLC v. Edgewood Partners Insurance Center, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2024
- City of Dania Beach and PGCS v. David ZipoliDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Flaherty v. FlahertyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.