Legal Opinion

Department of Revenue ex rel. Thorman v. Holley

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 1, 2012No. 1D11-3089PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The Department of Revenue (DOR), acting on behalf of Mary A. Thorman (the mother), appeals a final order ruling that *1201Robert G. Holley (the father) is no longer obligated to pay any child-support arrear-ages that he accrued but may not have satisfied. This ruling was based on the doctrines of laches and estoppel, as well as a determination that the father’s right to due process was violated by the numerous delays in arriving at a final arrearage amount. Under the circumstances of this case, none of these grounds justify relieving the father of his obligation to pay his past-due child support…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. West v. WestDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  2. Sun Cruz Casinos, LLC v. City of HollywoodDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  3. Cartee v. CarswellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Schroeder v. Peoplease Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  5. Gergen v. GergenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. William E. Campbell and Flora D. Campbell v. State of Florida Department of TransportationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  2. CBHIV LLC, and Sugar Dunes Owners Association, Inc. v. Walton County, Florida, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, AndDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
  3. Cardinal Point, LLC v. Edgewood Partners Insurance Center, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2024
  4. City of Dania Beach and PGCS v. David ZipoliDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  5. Flaherty v. FlahertyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API