Legal Opinion

Carter v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 8, 1906PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Accusation of vagrancy. Before Judge Hodges. City court of Macon. July 7, 1906.

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, P. J.

One wlio wanders and strolls about in idleness, with no lawful purpose or object whatever, an habitual loafer, idler, and vagabond, who is able to work, has no property, no reasonably continuous employment, and no regular income, is a vagrant within the meaning of the Penal Code, §453, par. 3; and this is true notwithstanding such person may have a fixed place of abode, where he usually lodges. Acts 1903, p. 46. Especially would such person be a vagrant when his loafing and loitering was about pool-rooms, bar-rooms, dives, lewd houses, and other places of like character.

2. The evidence,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Darby v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Hammond v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API