Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Providence Health & Services

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided July 9, 2019No. 3:18-cv-00281Unknown

1Opinion

WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA WILLIAM CURTIS, M.D., and PEDRO ) VALDES, M.D., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES, ) PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES- ) WASHINGTON, and BRUCE LAMOUREUX, ) ) No. 3:18-cv-0281-HRH Defendants. ) _______________________________________) O R D E R Motion to Compel Plaintiffs move for an order compelling defendant Providence Health & Services - Washington to respond to their Requests for Production Nos. 13-18.1 This motion is opposed.2 Oral argument has not been requested and is not deemed necessary. Plaintiffs,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Renfrow v. Redwood Fire & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API