Legal Opinion

Redanz v. Kuntz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 27, 1984Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: Special Term erred in ordering consolidation of an action for personal injury and property damage with an action for a declaratory judgment to determine whether an insurance company has a duty to defend the defendant in the first action. The prejudice inherent in a situation of this sort should be avoided (see Kelly v Yannotti, 4 NY2d 603, 607-608; Krieger v Insurance Co'., 66 AD2d 1025, 1026; Pierce v International Harvester Co., 65 AD2d 254, 258; McDavid v Gunnigle, 50 AD2d 737, 738; D'Apice v Tishman 919 Corp., 43…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kelly v. YannottiNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
  2. Krieger v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. McDavid v. GunnigleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. Pierce v. International Harvester Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API