Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mason v. Union Pacific Railway Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1890Published

Appeal from a judgment of dismissal of the district court of the first district. The opinion states the facts.

1DissentAndeRSOn, J.

I cannot assent to either the reasoning or the conclusion announced by the majority of the court in the opinion just delivered. It appears from the record^ that plaintiff's decedent, George S. Mason, sued the defendant in a commissioners' court for wrongfully ejecting him from a car on its road, claiming $300 damages. At the trial he recovered judgment for $200. The defendant appealed the case to the district court, but before the-case was reached for trial in that court the plaintiff died, and his administrator, the present plaintiff, was. substituted in his stead, with the consent of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Holton v. DalyIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Hegerich v. . KeddieNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Dibble v. New York & Erie Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Snyder v. . PlassNew York Court of Appeals · 1863

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API