Legal Opinion

Carolina Spruce Co. v. Black Mountain R.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1917PublishedCited by 8 opinions

FROM WASHINGTON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Washington County. — Hal. H. Haynes, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams

delivered the .opinion of the Court.

On motion. In this canse (disposed of in an opinion, 201 S. W., 154) the solicitors of the cross-complainant Black Mountain Railway Company move the court to fix reasonable fees for their services in this cause. The motion is based upon a provision in respect to attorney’s fee in the note in suit. This note was -one collateral in form; that is, it stipulated that ten mortgage bonds were attached as collateral security, and for a sale thereof by the holder on the maker-pledgor’s default. The note then recited:

“After the proceeds of any sale have been applied…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Arthur Lawrence Bain, Individually and D/B/A Arthur L. Bain Construction Company, Bankrupt. Womack Lumber Company, Inc., on Behalf of Walter C. Drake, Trustee, v Guaranty Mortgage CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  2. In Re KeatonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1995
  3. Womack Lumber Co. v. Guaranty Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  4. Strong v. Efficiency Apartment Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Julian v. American Nat. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API