Carolina Spruce Co. v. Black Mountain R.
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM WASHINGTON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Washington County. — Hal. H. Haynes, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams
delivered the .opinion of the Court.
On motion. In this canse (disposed of in an opinion, 201 S. W., 154) the solicitors of the cross-complainant Black Mountain Railway Company move the court to fix reasonable fees for their services in this cause. The motion is based upon a provision in respect to attorney’s fee in the note in suit. This note was -one collateral in form; that is, it stipulated that ten mortgage bonds were attached as collateral security, and for a sale thereof by the holder on the maker-pledgor’s default. The note then recited:
“After the proceeds of any sale have been applied…
2Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Arthur Lawrence Bain, Individually and D/B/A Arthur L. Bain Construction Company, Bankrupt. Womack Lumber Company, Inc., on Behalf of Walter C. Drake, Trustee, v Guaranty Mortgage CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- In Re KeatonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1995
- Womack Lumber Co. v. Guaranty Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Strong v. Efficiency Apartment Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1929
- Julian v. American Nat. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.