Legal Opinion

Armas v. Oregon State Penitentiary

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 22, 1979No. 03-79-076, CA 13909PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, J.

Petitioner was found guilty by the Prison Disciplinary Committee of violating Prison Discipline Rule 1, Disruptive Behavior,1 and Rule 13a, Conspiring to Commit a Rule Violation.2 Petitioner challenges the Committee’s consideration of the results of polygraph examination and contends that there is not substantial evidence to support the Committee’s findings.

On February 11, 1979, petitioner was questioned during a polygraph examination about his involvement in a prison strike and his attempts to organize "Mexican Mafia” gangs for the purpose of drug smuggling within the prison. On March 7,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. OREGON STATE PEN., CORRECTIONS DIV.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. Preston v. OREGON STATE PEN., COR. DIV.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. Robertson v. OR. STATE PEN., CORRECTIONS DIV.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  4. Stilling v. Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Varnson v. SatranNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API