Legal Opinion
United States v. Udo Mankiewicz and Glenn Zawadzki
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 8, 1997No. 96-2594, 96-2807PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
In these direct criminal appeals, Udo Mankiewicz and Glenn Zawadzki challenge the sentencing determinations of the district court that followed their pleas of guilty to conspiring to possess marijuana with intent to distribute. See 18 U.S.C. § 846. Each defendant was sentenced to 87 months in prison, a fine, and four years’ supervised release. For the reasons set forth in the following opinion, we reverse the judgments of the district court and remand the cases for further proceedings with respect to the sentences.
I
BACKGROUND
The basic facts of the underlying offense are…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Michael MustreadCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Gene E. BelerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. William Brown, Danny Brown, Scot Burkhead, Randall Sorrells, and Brian HollenbackCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Salvador AcostaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- United States v. David Carrera and Luis M. CarreraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Salvador A. VivitCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Willie P. Coleman, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Alex SierraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. DamatoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.