Legal Opinion
United States v. James D. Wainwright
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 9, 1991No. 90-3305PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARRETT, Senior Circuit Judge.
James D. Wainwright (“Wainwright”) appeals from a restitution order imposed following his plea of guilty to one count of bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 1344.
On May 8, 1990, Wainwright and Margaret J. Moore (“Moore”) were charged in a seven-count indictment accusing the two of “devis[ing] and intending] to devise a scheme or artifice to obtain monies, funds, or credits owned by and under the custody and control of” six different banks in the District of Kansas between September 4, 1987, and January 22, 1988. (R., Vol. I, Tab 1 at 2). 1 The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. PridgeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- United States v. LemireCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Bartone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- United States v. Joe Luis SaucedoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Barbara ChaneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Thomas A. Burger, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Inc., Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,709 United States of America v. Christopher Arutunoff, United States of America v. Steven J. Devries, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States of America v. Carless JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.