Legal Opinion
Pivnick v. Newark
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 29, 1951PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
14 N.J. Super. 134 (1951)
81 A.2d 409
MORRIS PIVNICK AND NEWARK BUILDERS SUPPLY COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND JOHN B. KEENAN, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFETY OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided May 29, 1951.
Messrs. Riker, Emery & Danzig (Mr. Charles Danzig appearing), attorneys for plaintiffs.
Mr. Charles Handler (Mr. George B. Astley of counsel), attorney for defendants.
WILLIAM A. SMITH, J.S.C.
This action in lieu of prerogative writ is brought to review an…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Garneau v. EggersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
- Barnes v. Essex County Park CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
- Barnes v. Essex County Park CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Cleveland v. AntonioOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
- TERMINAL STORAGE, INC. v. Tp. of RaritanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Apple Chevrolet, Inc. v. Fair Lawn BoroughNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- Schaad v. Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Ass'n of United Methodist ChurchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977