Legal Opinion

Tindal v. Smith

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 26, 1997PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

STERN, J.AD.

This is another difficult case involving a claim of medical malpractice impacted by a pre-existing condition and assertions that the patient’s health habits (specifically excessive smoking) contributed to her condition. Plaintiff contends that she devel*125oped Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy (RSD) as a result of surgery that should not have been performed and, in any event, was negligently performed. We affirm the judgment for defendants.

Plaintiffs Deborah and Tom Tindal appeal from a judgment of “no cause for action” based on a verdict in favor…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Conklin v. WeismanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  2. Scafidi v. SeilerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  3. Largey v. RothmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  4. Kaplan v. HainesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  5. Kaplan v. HainesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Janet Henebema v. South Jersey Transportation Authority and N.J. State Police (072545)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  2. Gonzalez v. SilverNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  3. Kimmel v. DayritNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  4. Christopherson v. St. Vincent HospitalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Holdsworth v. GallerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API