Tindal v. Smith
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
STERN, J.AD.
This is another difficult case involving a claim of medical malpractice impacted by a pre-existing condition and assertions that the patient’s health habits (specifically excessive smoking) contributed to her condition. Plaintiff contends that she devel*125oped Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy (RSD) as a result of surgery that should not have been performed and, in any event, was negligently performed. We affirm the judgment for defendants.
Plaintiffs Deborah and Tom Tindal appeal from a judgment of “no cause for action” based on a verdict in favor…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Conklin v. WeismanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Scafidi v. SeilerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Largey v. RothmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Kaplan v. HainesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Kaplan v. HainesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Janet Henebema v. South Jersey Transportation Authority and N.J. State Police (072545)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
- Gonzalez v. SilverNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
- Kimmel v. DayritNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Christopherson v. St. Vincent HospitalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
- Holdsworth v. GallerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.