Legal Opinion
Cochran v. M & M TRANSP. CO.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided March 22, 1940No. 3552PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAGRUDER, Circuit Judge.
This motion to dismiss, involving a consideration and interpretation of our mandate on a previous appeal (M & M Transportation Co. v. Cochran, Cir., 100 F.2d 207), presents a peculiar situation.
On the night of November 16, 1936, a motortruck of the Providence Teaming Company, operated by its servant Cochran, became stalled on a Massachusetts highway. Shortly thereafter a motortruck driven by a servant of the M & M Transportation Company crashed into it from the rear. The resulting fire consumed both vehicles. Cochran received severe personal injuries. Cochran and the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Lindheimer v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Johnson v. Cadillac Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
- Rogers v. Penobscot Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States v. Richard Harmon BellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Brunswick Corporation and Sherwood Medical Industries, Inc. v. David S. Sheridan and National Catheter CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- White v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
- Robesky v. Qantas Empire Airways Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Jamesbury Corporation v. Worcester Valve Company, Inc. v. E. W. Bliss Company, IntervenerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.